Composition patterns

The shape catalog names the seven building blocks — app locus, namespace locus, service locus, spawned child, @form collection with a domain facade, shape type, free fn. This chapter is the next layer up: the compositions of those blocks that recur in real Hale services, distilled from production use. Reach for one of these when a problem feels like it needs a new language feature — usually it doesn’t, it needs one of these shapes.

1. The three-locus gateway

Section titled “1. The three-locus gateway”

The canonical answer to “I have N dynamic, keyed children with their own lifecycles” (and to the rejection of putting loci in a hashmap):

pinned reader ──▶ cooperative manager ──▶ keyed per-entity child
(owns the fd, (accept()s a child (subscribe ... where
publishes events) per new key) key == self.id)

This gives you per-entity state and lifecycle without a map of loci — the bus is the routing table, keyed. Filtering in the handler instead (if u.id == self.id) is the anti-pattern this composition deletes: it delivers every message to every child and discards N-1 of N.

2. Demand-driven discovery

Section titled “2. Demand-driven discovery”

A special case of the gateway with zero hardcoded topology: the manager doesn’t know its children up front. A subscription triggers the accept():

// manager
bus { subscribe "entity.first_seen" as on_seen of type Seen; }
fn on_seen(s: Seen) {
// First message for this key → spawn its child now.
// Bare instantiation inside a parent method attaches the child:
// it triggers the enclosing accept(c) gatekeeper. `accept` is a
// lifecycle hook the runtime invokes, never a method you call.
Child { id: s.id };
}

The topology grows from the data. Combined with release, children appear on first contact and vanish when their flow ends — the process shape mirrors the live workload with no configuration. (If the manager doesn’t itself accept this child type, the child bubbles to the nearest accepting ancestor.)

3. Hot-path counters & gauges (and the CQRS rejection)

Section titled “3. Hot-path counters & gauges (and the CQRS rejection)”

You will want to write let n = self.metrics.incr("hits") on a hot path. Hale rejects locus methods that return locus values (the “CQRS” shape) — a method call that hands back a live locus reference breaks the closed-world ownership the substrate relies on. The rejection without a replacement strands you, so here is the migration:

Either way the hot path does an in-place field write or a publish — never a method that returns a locus.

4. The publish-policy gate

Section titled “4. The publish-policy gate”

When you produce data faster than you want to publish it (telemetry, book snapshots), gate the publish behind a tick() with a time-or-volume trigger rather than publishing per-update:

fn on_update(u: Update) {
self.pending = self.pending + 1;
self.acc = self.acc + u.delta; // accumulate in place
if self.pending >= 100 { self.flush(); } // volume trigger
}
fn tick() { // time trigger (scheduled)
if self.pending > 0 { self.flush(); }
}
fn flush() {
"snapshot" <- Snapshot { total: self.acc };
self.pending = 0;
}

The accumulation is in-place; only the flush crosses the bus. This keeps the high-frequency path allocation-free and bounds publish volume independently of input volume.

5. View lifetime — copy out to persist

Section titled “5. View lifetime — copy out to persist”

The zero-copy span/JSON APIs (StringView, BytesView, std::json::*_span) hand you a view into a buffer you don’t own. That view is valid only until the next operation that overwrites the buffer — the next recv, the next ring read. Holding it across that boundary reads freed/overwritten memory:

let name = std::json::find_string_field(msg, "name"); // view into recv buf
self.read_msg(); // ← overwrites the buffer
println(name); // ✗ dangling view

The rule: a view is valid until the next recv/overwrite; copy out to persist. Materialize it before the boundary:

let name = std::str::clone(std::json::find_string_field(msg, "name"));
self.read_msg();
println(name); // ✓ owns its own copy

Forgetting this is now panic-guarded (a stale-view access exits with a diagnostic rather than reading garbage), so you’ll see a clear “view used after its buffer was overwritten” message instead of a silent corruption — but the fix is always to clone out before the overwriting call.

6. The reused-buffer connection

Section titled “6. The reused-buffer connection”

Every production connection locus converges on the same three fields: buffers held as params, reused every frame, never instantiated in a handler:

locus WsConn {
params {
rx_buf: std::bytes::BytesBuilder = ...; // frame reassembly
tx_buf: std::bytes::BytesBuilder = ...; // send assembly
scratch: std::bytes::BytesBuilder = ...; // unmask / inflate
}
fn on_data(...) {
std::io::tcp::recv_into(self.fd, self.rx_buf, 65536);
// parse from self.rx_buf.view() — zero-copy
}
}

A builder created inside the handler is a fresh heap buffer per message that reclaims only at method return (the compiler warns). Read with .view() / .text_view() and clear the buffer at the start of the next cycle, not the end of this one, so views handed out stay valid between frames. The full hot-path discipline lives in the styleguide §4 and Performance.

7. Pre-render once, fan out many

Section titled “7. Pre-render once, fan out many”

When one event reaches N consumers, render the shared payload once at ingest; each consumer adds only its per-consumer delta:

// ingest: render once
self.update_json = render_update(t); // one render
Tick <- Update { json: self.update_json }; // fan out
// each connection: prepend its own seq only
fn on_update(u: Update) { self.send_frame("" + self.seq + u.json); }

N× a tiny prepend beats N× a full render. Pair it with the two-flavor emitter convention: a std::json::Builder version for cold paths (readable, allocating) and a raw-concat _pre version for the hot fan-out — keeping both documents which callers are hot.

8. Event-driven ingest

Section titled “8. Event-driven ingest”

One reader locus per source, parked on readiness — never a poll loop with set_recv_timeout:

main locus App {
params { r0: Reader = Reader { port: 9000 }; r1: Reader = Reader { port: 9001 }; }
placement {
r0: cooperative(pool = ingest) where async_io;
r1: cooperative(pool = ingest) where async_io;
}
}

Each reader’s recv parks its coroutine on EPOLLIN; N readers share one pool worker with microsecond wakes (measured ~4 µs p50). Poll-scanner sleeps accumulate tail-latency debt that looks like a runtime problem but is the sleep schedule. Blocking I/O that can’t park (TLS today) goes on pinned instead — see Concurrency & placement.